Public Pressure, Temptation of Power and Unconstitutional Actions in the War Against Terrorism in Kenya: Suggesting a Link

Authors

  • Cecil Yongo Strathmore University Law School (Nairobi, Kenya)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52907/slr.v1i1.84

Keywords:

Unconstitutional , Terrorism, Temptation of Power, Rule of Law, Kenya

Abstract

The reaction of the government in Kenya, like many other governments around the world, to terrorist attacks has generally been to strengthen existing laws and enact novel laws, especially those that aid the state’s intelligence-gathering capabilities, along with those that are punitive. In some cases, even in Kenya, States have taken, or have attempted to take, extra-Constitutional and unconstitutional actions. This is the approach that this paper characterises as arising from ‘temptation of power’, and in that regard, this interdisciplinary paper is—through an analysis of scholarship in law, sociology and information/ communication—an attempt to investigate the origin, results and wisdom of such an approach in the war against terror, its effect on the rule of law and minority rights in society; and propose why and how it can be avoided.

Author Biography

Cecil Yongo, Strathmore University Law School (Nairobi, Kenya)

Founding Editor in Chief of the Strathmore Law Review 2014-2016

Downloads

Published

2016-01-01

How to Cite

Yongo, C. (2016). Public Pressure, Temptation of Power and Unconstitutional Actions in the War Against Terrorism in Kenya: Suggesting a Link. Strathmore Law Review, 1(1), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.52907/slr.v1i1.84