Global Health Governance’s Colour Line : How Finance Has Shaped Global Health Disparities in African Countries

Authors

  • Lyla Latif University of Nairobi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52907/slj.v8i2.545

Keywords:

Colonialism, Global Health Governance, Global South, Inequalities, International Finance

Abstract

The global health financing structure carries imprints of colonial-era power dynamics, perpetuating health inequities between the Global North and South. Tracing the historical origins of these inequities, this paper analyses how colonial policies and philosophies shaped early health systems to serve the interests of the European colonisers over indigenous populations in Africa. Consequently, this paper demonstrates how institutionalised racial biases from the colonial period echo in contemporary global health governance. The analysis shows the connections between historic prejudices, economic exploitation, and persisting disparities in the Global South. The author highlights how present-day inequities stem from systemic imbalances in global health financing and governance rooted in colonial mentalities. Furthermore, the author scrutinises how these colonial legacies have influenced global financial institutions and manifested in unequal resource allocation, priorities, and access—widening the global disease burden gap. The author also discusses the emergence of digital health apps and how their financing and data stewardship can risk perpetuating new forms of exploitation reminiscent of colonial extractivism. Therefore, the author argues that rectifying these structural flaws by realigning financing and governance is essential for equitable global health.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lyla Latif, University of Nairobi

PhD, Lecturer, University of Nairobi, Faculty of Law (Nairobi, Kenya)

Downloads

Published

2025-04-28

How to Cite

Latif, L. (2025). Global Health Governance’s Colour Line : How Finance Has Shaped Global Health Disparities in African Countries. Strathmore Law Journal, 8(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.52907/slj.v8i2.545