Discreet Discretion and Moderate Moderation in Judicial Sentencing: A commentary on Kenya’s Sentencing Policy Guidelines, 2016

Authors

  • Harrison O Mbori Strathmore University (Nairobi, Kenya)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52907/slj.v3i1.33

Keywords:

Judgments, Kenya Judicial System, Discretional Powers, Moderation, Criminal Justice

Abstract

Criminal sentencing is an integral part in any judicial system for the fair administration of justice. The process of sentencing and the standards applied by judicial officers has, however, been a notoriously difficult component in many criminal law systems. In Kenya, sentencing has been blamed as one of the sources of ‘popular dissatisfaction with the administration of justice’ to borrow from Roscoe Pound. This was the impetus for the Kenyan Judiciary to introduce the Sentencing Policy Guidelines, 2016 (SPGs). This paper is a general commentary, critique, and analysis of the SPGs. The author argues that SPGs come at an instructive epoch in Kenya’s economic, socio-political, and cultural development. This contribution is not a polemic on the Kenyan SPGs. The commentary makes sideglances to various jurisdictions that have had a longer experience with sentencing guidelines. The article forecasts that Kenyan SPGs will, despite its few shortcomings, nevertheless, prove to be important for all judicial officers involved in Kenya’s criminal justice system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Harrison O Mbori, Strathmore University (Nairobi, Kenya)

LLB (University of Nairobi), LLM (Loyola, Chicago). The author thanks Ms Kasyoka Mutunga for her support in writing this work.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-01

How to Cite

O Mbori, H. (2017). Discreet Discretion and Moderate Moderation in Judicial Sentencing: A commentary on Kenya’s Sentencing Policy Guidelines, 2016. Strathmore Law Journal, 3(1), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.52907/slj.v3i1.33